When most people think of forensic analysis, the term “engineering” usually isn’t the first thing that pops into their mind. Most people usually associate forensic analysis with cold-blooded crime cases, high-profile theft cases, and DNA testing. What most people don’t realize, however, is that forensic analysis is used in conjunction with engineering almost on a daily basis. Although these types of cases might not make it on the nightly news, forensic analysis plays a critical role in determining where the fault lies in cases of engineering catastrophes, failures, and similar incidents. So how, exactly, is forensic analysis used to determine where the fault lies in engineering failures and how does this relationship work? What does this relationship look like from a practical standpoint? Whether investigators are utilizing the practices and theories of forensic analysis in Houston or in New York City, one thing is clear: forensic analysis is a key component in cases of engineering failures. Companies such as www.sealimitedhouston.com use investigative forensic analysis to dig deep into the root causes of workplace catastrophes, architectural failures, mechanical engineering accidents, and similar events. Here’s an introspective look at how these two very different scientific fields interact.
Using Forensic Analysis to Pinpoint Blame
In murder cases, forensic analysis is often used in conjunction with DNA testing and similar tactics to pinpoint the murderer and accomplices. Through a series of scientific tests, deductive reasoning and logic, and analysis of evidence, investigators can usually gain a pretty comprehensive understanding of who the main suspect is in a murder case. Although engineering failures may not always include blood sample analyses or DNA testing, similar forensic analysis techniques are applied to gain a better understanding of what caused a building to collapse or a gas tank to explode. When there is death involved in any type of structural failure, mechanical error, or related catastrophe, the families of the victims both want and deserve closure. Part of this closure includes understanding exactly what caused the catastrophe and who is to blame. Sometimes, a catastrophe is the fault of an engineer or architect; however, in many cases, there are simply unforeseen circumstances that occur that are not the fault of any one single person. As engineers continue to design, build, and create, it becomes increasingly more important that they don’t repeat the catastrophic mistakes of the past. Through the use of forensic analysis, engineers can understand exactly what has caused a catastrophe and can therefore avoid the occurrence of a similar one in the future.
The Components of a Forensic Team
An engineering forensic analysis team doesn’t, contrary to popular belief, mimic a Sherlock Holmes and John Watson-type of partnership. On the contrary, an engineering forensic analysis team is, out of necessity, quite large and diverse. Analyzing engineering failures requires the expertise of the following types of engineers: mechanical, civil and structural, biomechanical, biomedical, electrical, geotechnical, vehicular, and material and metallurgical. In addition to these diverse types of engineers, forensic analysis teams also typically include a trained team of lab experts, forensic nurses, expert witnesses, and additional specialists. Finding, dissecting, and analyzing the root cause of a catastrophe is a huge task that spans several different types of fields and areas of studies; due to this, a large and diverse team is absolutely essential. Forensic analysis teams, such as www.sealimitedhouston.com, employ an ever-growing and expanding team of experts in order to continually assess diverse types of catastrophes in the most proficient manner possible.